[build2] Reverse Dependency via Defines
build2.org at k-moeller.dk
Mon Dec 3 14:41:42 UTC 2018
Have you any thoughts on how reverse dependencies should be handled?
Here I think about libraries/programs that let you optionally/required to
provide header and maybe even a library.
This is used in boost config
#if !defined(BOOST_USER_CONFIG) && !defined(BOOST_NO_USER_CONFIG)
# define BOOST_USER_CONFIG <boost/config/user.hpp>
# include BOOST_USER_CONFIG
This for me also ties into how should you handle poptions that a headerfile
set? Im here thinking about cxx.export.poptions, should that get populated
with these defines?
And sorry if this is already in the manual, but I have not been able to
locate this in it.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the users